Re: Panic on 2.6.0-test1-mm1

From: Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 19:18:41 EST

Next message: Mariusz Zielinski: "xfs problems (2.6.0-test2)"
Previous message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Panic on 2.6.0-test1-mm1"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Panic on 2.6.0-test1-mm1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> I don't believe it would be valuable to push it on the grounds of
> performance, as the performance characteristics of modern midrange i386
> systems don't have such high remote access penalties.

Others might be interested to know about the effects (performance, memory
consumption etc) nonetheless, regardless of how large or negligible. It
helps in finding out where to start looking when things improve (or regress).

Thanks for the work anyway,
Zwane

-- 
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mariusz Zielinski: "xfs problems (2.6.0-test2)"
Previous message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: OHCI problems with suspend/resume"
In reply to: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Panic on 2.6.0-test1-mm1"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: Panic on 2.6.0-test1-mm1"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:52 EST