Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()

From: OGAWA Hirofumi (hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 10:00:36 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [Patch 3/6] dm: decimal device num sscanf"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] O10int for interactivity"
In reply to: David Weinehall: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Next in thread: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> writes:

> And how big is the performance loss? Is it even measurable?
> And even if it is, is optimizing this really worth the trouble?

48bytes smaller than prev. I think It's not a clear reason for
rejecting a patch.

-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [Patch 3/6] dm: decimal device num sscanf"
Previous message: Jamie Lokier: "Re: [PATCH] O10int for interactivity"
In reply to: David Weinehall: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Next in thread: Denis Vlasenko: "Re: [PATCH] Inline vfat_strnicmp()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:50 EST