Re: 2.6.0-test2-mm1 results

From: Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 09:56:06 EST


--Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote (on Thursday, July 31, 2003 01:28:49 +1000):

> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:01, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> OK, so test2-mm1 fixes the panic I was seeing in test1-mm1.
>> Only noticeable thing is that -mm tree is consistently a little slower
>> at kernbench
>
> Could conceivably be my hacks throwing the cc cpu hogs onto the expired array
> more frequently.

Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks)
                              Elapsed System User CPU
              2.6.0-test2 46.05 115.20 571.75 1491.25
          2.6.0-test2-con 46.98 121.02 583.55 1498.75
          2.6.0-test2-mm1 46.95 121.18 582.00 1497.50

Good guess ;-)

Does this help interactivity a lot, or was it just an experiment?
Perhaps it could be less agressive or something?

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:50 EST