On Wednesday 30 July 2003 10:29, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
Hi Felipe,
> I'm running 2.6.0-test2-mm1 + O11int.patch + O11.1int.patch and I must
> say this is getting damn good! In the past, I've had to tweak scheduler
> knobs to tune the engine to my taste, but since O10, this is a thing of
> the past. It's working as smooth as silk...
> Good work!
I really really wonder why I don't experience this behaviour. For me, the best
scheduler patch in the past was the one from you. I had a test last night
with 011.1 and I rebooted into 2.4 back after some hours of testing because
it is unusable for me under load, and it is no heavy load, it's just for
example a simple "make -j2 bzImage modules".
What makes me even more wondering is that 2.6.0-test1-wli tree does not suck
at all for interactivity where no scheduler changes were made.
Maybe we need both: VM fixups (we need them anyway!) and O(1) fixups so that
also my machine will be happy ;)
ciao, Marc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:44 EST