On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> >
> > > So this looks OK, yes?
> >
> > I suppose boomerang_interrupt itself is OK.
> > Spending 104 ms in IRQ 0, 31 ms in IRQ 11, and
> > 44 ms in IRQ 14 is not at all OK. I was hoping
> > to get under 200 microseconds for everything.
>
> I misread that.
>
> Last time I checked (which was about 18 months ago) the maximum
> interrupts-off time on a 500MHz desktop-class machine was 80 microseconds.
IDE has traditionally been a small headache in that department. I need to
find out how it fares in 2.5
-- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:42 EST