Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning.

From: Randy.Dunlap (rddunlap@osdl.org)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 10:35:07 EST


On 29 Jul 2003 12:57:52 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

| On Maw, 2003-07-29 at 11:20, Tomas Szepe wrote:
| > > What is the difference between backporting a patch from 3.3.1-pre to 3.3,
| > > and using 3.3.1-pre directly ? Ah, that you get less bug corrected.
| >
| > Large. 3.3 is a development series. It DOES introduce new stuff.
| >
| > In production environments you definitely want to stick with 3.2.3
| > or (better yet) 2.95.3.
|
| 3.2 is probably the best, but lots of people are using gcc 3.3 to build
| kernels and so far all the things we've hit have been the stricter
| parser throwing up on technically invalid C in the kernel source/

I really hate to get this back to the original problem, but is
the reported warning a gcc 3.3.x problem? I don't see the assembly
problem here.

| arch/i386/kernel/reboot.c: In function `machine_restart':
| arch/i386/kernel/reboot.c:261: warning: use of memory input without
| lvalue in asm operand 0 is deprecated

--
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:41 EST