Re: as / scheduler question

From: Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 18:32:26 EST


On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 16:25, Con Kolivas wrote:

> If kblockd is reniced to -10 it wont have a problem unless something else
> ends up with the same dynamic priority which would only happen if there
> are interactive tasks reniced to -10. If it's the only process on the
> active array at that priority it _should_ run unaffected.

Even if it is not, it should easily complete what little it has to do
within 25ms... so Ingo's patches should not affect it.

        Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:38 EST