Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.0-test2] get rid of unused request_queue field queue_wait

From: Jens Axboe (axboe@suse.de)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 08:20:45 EST

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] ALSA update 0.9.6"
Previous message: Jaroslav Kysela: "Re: [PATCH] ALSA update 0.9.6"
In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.0-test2] get rid of unused request_queue field queue_wait"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jul 28 2003, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28 2003, Lou Langholtz wrote:
> > Are we going to use the queue_wait field of struct request_queue
> > someday? As of 2.6.0-test2, I don't see any use of it. If it's not
> > needed anymore, the following patch gets rid of it. Tested this patch by
> > compiling for i386 and also doing a grep through all .h and .c files to
> > see if it's used somewhere else (admittedly weak).
>
> It's a relic from before dynamic request allocation, for now it can
> definitely go.

Eh sorry, still very much jet lagged. It has nothing to do with request
allocation. The point still stands though, it can be removed.

-- Jens Axboe

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH] ALSA update 0.9.6"
Previous message: Jaroslav Kysela: "Re: [PATCH] ALSA update 0.9.6"
In reply to: Jens Axboe: "Re: [RFC][PATCH 2.6.0-test2] get rid of unused request_queue field queue_wait"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:35 EST