Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)

From: Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 06:30:35 EST

Next message: Rahul Karnik: "Re: [PATCH] Remove module reference counting."
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: i8042 problem"
In reply to: Daniel Egger: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
Next in thread: Jussi Laako: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Daniel Egger wrote:

>Are you sure CF cards have wear leveling? I'm pretty confident that they
>have defect sector management but no wear leveling. There's a huge
>difference between those two.
>
I am told that they do by flx. After all, they are most used for the
FAT filesystem.

-- Hans

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Rahul Karnik: "Re: [PATCH] Remove module reference counting."
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: i8042 problem"
In reply to: Daniel Egger: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
Next in thread: Jussi Laako: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:35 EST