Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches

From: Måns Rullgård (mru@users.sourceforge.net)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 05:37:50 EST

Next message: Carlos Velasco: "Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices"
Previous message: Jonas Bofjall: "FYI: TCQ ReiserFS Corruption on 2.6.0-test1-mm2"
In reply to: Felipe Alfaro Solana: "Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches"
Next in thread: Diego Calleja García: "Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org> writes:

>> > It is interesting that Felipe says that stock 2.5.69 was the best CPU
>> > scheduler of the 2.5 series. Do others agree with that?
>
>> No.
>> For me, 2.5.63 was the best. Or perhaps it was .64 or .65?
>
> Well, for me now, the best scheduler is 2.6.0-test2 plus Con's O10
> patch.

Could someone give a brief comparison between Con's O10int and Ingo's
G7 patches?

-- Måns Rullgård mru@users.sf.net

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Carlos Velasco: "Re: [2.4 PATCH] bugfix: ARP respond on all devices"
Previous message: Jonas Bofjall: "FYI: TCQ ReiserFS Corruption on 2.6.0-test1-mm2"
In reply to: Felipe Alfaro Solana: "Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches"
Next in thread: Diego Calleja García: "Re: Ingo Molnar and Con Kolivas 2.6 scheduler patches"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:35 EST