On Mon, 28 Jul 2003, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 23:40, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > - further increase timeslice granularity
>
> For a while now I've been running a 1000Hz 2.4 O(1) kernel tree that
> uses timeslice granularity set to MIN_TIMESLICE which has stark
> smoothness improvements in X. I've avoided promoting this idea because
> of the theoretical drop in throughput this might cause. I've not been
> able to see any detriment in my basic testing of this small granularity,
> so I was curious to see what you throught was a reasonable lower limit?
it's a hard question. The 25 msecs in -G6 is probably too low.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:34 EST