Decided to try building stock 2.6.0-test2 on an Ultra 60 sitting here,
and ran into a redefinition of ffb_options between ffb_drv.c and
drm_drv.h. The one in ffb_drv.c looks redundant to me, and after
removing it I was able to successfully compile and boot the resulting
kernel.
Tugrul Galatali
diff -u linux-2.6.0-test2/drivers/char/drm/ffb_drv.c.orig linux-2.6.0-test2/drivers/char/drm/ffb_drv.c
--- linux-2.6.0-test2/drivers/char/drm/ffb_drv.c.orig 2003-07-27 17:08:18.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.0-test2/drivers/char/drm/ffb_drv.c 2003-07-27 17:06:58.000000000 -0400
@@ -372,25 +372,6 @@
return ret;
}
-#ifndef MODULE
-/* DRM(options) is called by the kernel to parse command-line options
- * passed via the boot-loader (e.g., LILO). It calls the insmod option
- * routine, drm_parse_drm.
- */
-
-/* JH- We have to hand expand the string ourselves because of the cpp. If
- * anyone can think of a way that we can fit into the __setup macro without
- * changing it, then please send the solution my way.
- */
-static int __init ffb_options(char *str)
-{
- DRM(parse_options)(str);
- return 1;
-}
-
-__setup(DRIVER_NAME "=", ffb_options);
-#endif
-
#include "drm_fops.h"
#include "drm_init.h"
#include "drm_ioctl.h"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:33 EST