Re: time for some drivers to be removed?

From: Adrian Bunk (bunk@fs.tum.de)
Date: Sun Jul 27 2003 - 10:31:18 EST


On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:20:44AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> i've mentioned this before, but in a perfect world, should it
> be possible to build a release version of the kernel with
> "make allyesconfig". this is generally not possible, since there's
> always the occasional broken driver that just won't compile.
>
> more to the point, there are drivers that seem to be perpetually
> broken. as an example, the riscom8 driver has been borked for as
> long as i can remember. at some point, shouldn't something like
> this either be fixed or just removed? what's the point of
> perpetually bundling a driver that doesn't even compile?

A first patch is at
  http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0306.2/0770.html

I'll send an updated patch against -test2 or -test3.

Ideally, these drivers will be fixed during 2.6 when more people start
using 2.6...

> rday

cu
Adrian

-- 

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:32 EST