Re: [PATCH] Make I/O schedulers optional (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase)

• Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
• Previous message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: [RFC] TCP and UDP implementations"
• In reply to: Bernardo Innocenti: "[PATCH] Make I/O schedulers optional (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase)"
• Next in thread: Bernardo Innocenti: "Re: [PATCH] Make I/O schedulers optional (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase)"
• Reply: Bernardo Innocenti: "Re: [PATCH] Make I/O schedulers optional (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@develer.com> wrote:
>
> > Removing the I/O schedulers is pretty trivial, please come up with a
> > patch to make both of them optional and maybe add a trivial noop one.
>
> Here it is, attached below. I've tested it on both i386 and m68knommu.

Is nice, but I wonder if it should be appearing under the

        General Setup -> Remove kernel features

menu? ie: CONFIG_EMBEDDED.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Andrew Morton: "Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)"
• Previous message: Matti Aarnio: "Re: [RFC] TCP and UDP implementations"
• In reply to: Bernardo Innocenti: "[PATCH] Make I/O schedulers optional (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase)"
• Next in thread: Bernardo Innocenti: "Re: [PATCH] Make I/O schedulers optional (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase)"
• Reply: Bernardo Innocenti: "Re: [PATCH] Make I/O schedulers optional (Was: Re: Kernel 2.6 size increase)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:28 EST