Re: [uClinux-dev] Kernel 2.6 size increase - get_current()?

From: Denis Vlasenko (vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua)
Date: Fri Jul 25 2003 - 02:25:31 EST


On 24 July 2003 11:13, Ihar \"Philips\" Filipau wrote:
> I mean 'inline' which means 'this has to be inlined or it will
> break' and 'inline' which means 'inline this please - it adds only 10k
> of code bloat and improve performance in my suppa-puppa-bench by 0.000001%!'
>
> Strictly speaking - separate 'inline' to 'require_inline' and
> 'better_inline'.
> So people who really care about image size - can turn
> 'better_inline' into void, without harm to functionality.
> Actually I saw real performance improvements on my Pentium MMX 133
> (it has $i16k+$d16k of caches I beleive) when I was cutting some of
> inlines out. and I'm not talking about (cache poor) embedded systems...

Which inlines? Let the list know

--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:25 EST