Denis,
@ $7K per card you will not have to worry for a while :-O
-a
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On 25 July 2003 03:22, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > In article <200307250156.47108.fredrik@dolda2000.cjb.net> you wrote:
> > > On the other hand, I cannot imagine that noone would have thought of it. What
> > > is the reason for this? Is there another interface that I should use instead
> > > of /proc/net/dev to gather byte statistics for interfaces?
> >
> > it is for performance reasons. You can
> >
> > a) collect your numbers more often and asume wrap/reboot if numbers
> > decrease
> > b) use iptables counters instead
> >
> > BTW: it is a very often discussed topic, personally (as net tools
> > maintainer) I would love to see 64bit counters here, but this still means
> > you have to sample often enough, so you do not lose numbers on crash.
>
> I sample the data every minute. Will need to do it much more often
> on 10ge ifaces, when those will appear at my home ;)
>
> Or we will need 64bit counters then.
> --
> vda
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:24 EST