-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 24 July 2003 23:26, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <200307250437.50928.fredrik@dolda2000.cjb.net> you wrote:
> > I almost thought that would be it. I do understand that that code needs
> > to be really clean, but, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't GCC's long
> > long implementation efficient enough to only add minimal overhead to
> > that?
>
> I think there is mainly an issue with atomic incremets. I am not sure if
> the counter can be incremeted concurrently, or if the code path would be
> serialized, but there is always the reading side, which may need to retry
> an read. Besides that, the counter is in the fast path, so it will add some
> delay to packet handling.
>
> I guess a 64bit implementation will need to be a per-cpu solution.
I am actually working on it.
Jeff.
- --
You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the
freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
- Abbie Hoffman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/IKjYwFP0+seVj/4RAi30AKCKSue0MzoXXggx0BJriERW5DXpIQCg1ECY
ZDgy8Dra96jzj4zJz/pGAW0=
=wuhA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:24 EST