Re: why the current kernel config menu layout is a mess

From: Bernd Eckenfels (ecki-lkm@lina.inka.de)
Date: Thu Jul 24 2003 - 20:27:45 EST


In article <Pine.LNX.4.53.0307242020140.23200@localhost.localdomain> you wrote:
> the suboption "Support for paging of anonymous memory".
> might this not go under "Processor type and features",
> where there are other memory-related options?

well, i think it is architecture independend

> "Power management options"

> in addition, though, i'm not sure "CPU frequency scaling"
> belongs here. it might just as well fit under "Processor type
> and features", although that may be nit-picking.

Power Management and System Configuration

could be a better heading

> "Bus options (PCI, PCMCIA, EIAS, MCA, ISA)
>
> if this is for busses, why aren't the other busses here as
> well? shouldn't USB be here as well?

I think this is concernd with mainboard's main bus only (i2c is an aux
mainboard bus and usb, firewire are device busses)

> "Character devices" (jumping ahead just a bit)
> "Block devices"
> "Multiple devices (RAID and LVM)"

Well, if we go along the line of using unix naming, then MD can be moved ot
block devices, not to filesystems.

> "Fusion MPT"
>
> hard to believe this deserves its own top-level entry,
> but i could be wrong.

yes, very strange.

> "IEEE 1394"
> it's a bus, right? move it there.

i would suggest to have the section separated into system internal stuff
(cpu, mainboard bus, management bus, memory, apci, ..) and external
interfaces (usb, firewire, legacy/serial/, legacy/parallel, legacy/ps2,
...)

Greetings
Bernd

-- 
eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/
Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:24 EST