On Wednesday 23 July 2003 23:57, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> NOTE: I just noticed the 2.4.x kernel was built with -O1 because I
> had symbolic debug enabled. That's not fair: 2.4.20 would probably
> come out even smaller than I reported!
Here come the numbers:
text data bss dec hex filename
640564 39152 134260 813976 c6b98 linux-2.4.x/linux-O1
633028 37952 134260 805240 c4978 linux-2.4.x/linux-Os
So the new comparison base is:
text data bss dec hex filename
633028 37952 134260 805240 c4978 linux-2.4.x/linux-Os
819276 52460 78896 950632 e8168 linux-2.5.x/vmlinux-inline-Os
^^^^^^
2.6 still needs a hard diet... :-/
-- // Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept. \X/ http://www.develer.com/Please don't send Word attachments - http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:51 EST