Re: [Lse-tech] [patch 2.6.0-test1] per cpu times

From: bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 16:50:42 EST


In article <20030718111850.C1627@w-mikek2.beaverton.ibm.com>,
Mike Kravetz <kravetz@us.ibm.com> wrote:

| On a somewhat related note ...
|
| We (Big Blue) have a performance reporting application that
| would like to know how long a task sits on a runqueue before
| it is actually given the CPU. In other words, it wants to
| know how long the 'runnable task' was delayed due to contention
| for the CPU(s). Of course, one could get an overall feel for
| this based on total runqueue length. However, this app would
| really like this info on a per-task basis.

This is certainly a useful number. It's easy to tell when the CPU is "in
use," but it's not easy to tell when it's "busy" and processes are
waiting for a CPU.

-- 
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
  CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:50 EST