Re: [Fwd: Re: Kernel 2.4 CPU Arch issues]

From: jw schultz (jw@pegasys.ws)
Date: Mon Jul 21 2003 - 14:23:43 EST

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp / 2.6.0-test1"
Previous message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: Bug Report: 2.4.22-pre5: BUG in page_alloc (fwd)"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [Fwd: Re: Kernel 2.4 CPU Arch issues]"
Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [Fwd: Re: Kernel 2.4 CPU Arch issues]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 07:39:16AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2003-07-21 at 01:25, William M. Quarles wrote:
> > Well, wouldn't changing the gcc -march option and/or adding -mcpu
> > options for the various processors in the Makefile make a difference, as
> > the patchfile suggests?
>
> Currently - no. gcc knows a lot more processor names that require individual
> unique optimisation

no && s/that/than/

-- ________________________________________________________________ J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies email address: jw@pegasys.ws

Remember Cernan and Schmitt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pavel Machek: "Re: swsusp / 2.6.0-test1"
Previous message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "Re: Bug Report: 2.4.22-pre5: BUG in page_alloc (fwd)"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [Fwd: Re: Kernel 2.4 CPU Arch issues]"
Next in thread: J.A. Magallon: "Re: [Fwd: Re: Kernel 2.4 CPU Arch issues]"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:44 EST