Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Date: Sat Jul 19 2003 - 13:41:23 EST

Next message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: Bitkeeper"
Previous message: Sean: "[PATCH] "blk: request botched" error on floppy write"
In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD"
Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD"
Reply: Larry McVoy: "Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 11:12:49AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> The microkernel part of any reasonable microkernel is tiny.

And who says Mach is a reasonable microkernel :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jan-Benedict Glaw: "Re: Bitkeeper"
Previous message: Sean: "[PATCH] "blk: request botched" error on floppy write"
In reply to: Larry McVoy: "Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD"
Next in thread: Larry McVoy: "Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD"
Reply: Larry McVoy: "Re: [OT] HURD vs Linux/HURD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:38 EST