On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 07:33:19AM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> | Isosynchronous is (was?) not an English word.
> |
> | Oh, but we aren't speaking English - this is about USB devices.
> | Read the USB standard and see that it has an isosynchronous mode.
>
> It does? I can't find it in the main USB 2.0 spec.
> It discusses isochronous, which is what I would prefer to see,
> regardless of the USB spec.
Ah, yes, you are right. I did a grep on the USB docs directory
and it is full of isosynchronous, but those are all fragments
from the net. The actual standards correctly use isochronous.
Sorry.
Andries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:34 EST