Re: do_div64 generic

From: george anzinger (george@mvista.com)
Date: Thu Jul 17 2003 - 18:10:19 EST

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH] print_dev_t for 2.6.0-test1-mm"
Previous message: george anzinger: "Re: do_div64 generic"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: do_div64 generic"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: do_div64 generic"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: do_div64 generic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Andrew Morton wrote:
> Bernardo Innocenti <bernie@develer.com> wrote:
>
>>2) replace all uses of div_long_long_rem() (I see onlt 4 of them in
>> 2.6.0-test1) with do_div(). This is slightly less efficient, but
>> easier to maintain in the long term.
>
>
> Ths one's OK by me. Let's just fix the bug with minimum risk and churn.

Uh, bug? I was not aware that there was a bug. As far as I know,
nothing is broken.

>
>

-- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andries Brouwer: "Re: [PATCH] print_dev_t for 2.6.0-test1-mm"
Previous message: george anzinger: "Re: do_div64 generic"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: do_div64 generic"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: do_div64 generic"
Reply: Andrew Morton: "Re: do_div64 generic"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:31 EST