On Thursday 17 July 2003 14:38, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:33:59AM +0200, J.A. Magallon wrote:
[...]
>People use OSS in 2.4 and the smooth transition is to continue to
> use OSS in 2.6.
>
>cu
>Adrian
Hummph... I've intermitently been trying to make alsa work on the
so-called AC97 chipset on my motherboard for something in excess of 2
years now. Alsa development has been at a snails pace and probably
won't get to my current Biostar M7-VIB mobo before its obsolete.
OSS? Works out of the box, cost me IIRC a 20 dollar bill, and has
been updated at least 10 times since I first paid the shareware fee.
IMO money well spent.
If OSS does not work in 2.6, then it'll be a while before I'm doing
2.6. But I suspect it will be just fine by the time the real 2.6.0
is out.
-- Cheers, Gene AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M Athlon1600XP@1400mhz 512M 99.26% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com attornies please note, additions to this message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2003 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:30 EST