Re: SET_MODULE_OWNER

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com)
Date: Thu Jul 17 2003 - 10:32:32 EST


Ricardo Bugalho wrote:
> Hi all,
> most net device drivers have replaced MOD_INC/DEC_USE_COUNT with
> SET_MODULE_OWNER but SET_MODULE_OWNER doesn't do nothing.
> Therefore, those modules (though I can only vouch for 8139too) always
> report 0 use. Some people that had "modprobe -r" in their cronttab found
> it quite annoying.
> I'd guess that there's a good reason for why struct net_device doesn't
> have .owner field and why this happens. Can someone be so kind to point
> it
> out?

struct net_device does have an owner field, and SET_MODULE_OWNER
obviously _does_ do something.

If your interface is up, your net driver's module refcount is greater
than zero.

        Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:29 EST