Re: [PATCH] pdcraid and weird IDE geometry

From: Arjan van de Ven (arjanv@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Jul 17 2003 - 03:49:02 EST

Next message: Eugene Teo: "Re: [PATCH] O6.1int"
Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH] print_dev_t for 2.6.0-test1-mm"
In reply to: Walt H: "[PATCH] pdcraid and weird IDE geometry"
Next in thread: Walt H: "Re: [PATCH] pdcraid and weird IDE geometry"
Reply: Walt H: "Re: [PATCH] pdcraid and weird IDE geometry"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 04:26, Walt H wrote:
> compatible with the binary FastTrak.o module. I'm not much of a coder,
> so if this could be done more efficiently than my attached patch, please
> let me know. Please CC any replies. Thanks,

(un)fortionatly it's not valid to use floating point in the kernel.
Could you try the same thing by using u64 as type instead please ?

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Eugene Teo: "Re: [PATCH] O6.1int"
Previous message: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH] print_dev_t for 2.6.0-test1-mm"
In reply to: Walt H: "[PATCH] pdcraid and weird IDE geometry"
Next in thread: Walt H: "Re: [PATCH] pdcraid and weird IDE geometry"
Reply: Walt H: "Re: [PATCH] pdcraid and weird IDE geometry"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:28 EST