Re: [PATCH][2.6] fix warning in iee1394 nodemgr

From: Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@arm.linux.org.uk)
Date: Wed Jul 16 2003 - 11:21:03 EST

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: Input layer demand loading"
Previous message: Matthew Dharm: "Re: e1000 with 82546EB parts on 2.4?"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] fix warning in iee1394 nodemgr"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, David S. Miller wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 10:10:08 -0400
> Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> wrote:
>
> > I'm a little concerned that I've never seen either of the two warnings
> > you showed. I've been building with -Werror for awhile now.
>
> GCC generates slightly different flow graphs on different
> platforms, and from version to version gcc's "might be used
> uninitialized" accuracy varies :-)

Come to think of it, i just switched back to RH 2.96 for my test kernels
(just for compile speed, slow build box).

-- 
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: Input layer demand loading"
Previous message: Matthew Dharm: "Re: e1000 with 82546EB parts on 2.4?"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH][2.6] fix warning in iee1394 nodemgr"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST