Re: Status of the IO scheduler fixes for 2.4

From: Marc-Christian Petersen (m.c.p@wolk-project.de)
Date: Thu Jul 03 2003 - 07:31:27 EST


On Thursday 03 July 2003 04:02, Chris Mason wrote:

Hi Chris,

> So, the patch attached includes the q->full code but has it off by
> default. I've got code locally for an elvtune interface that can toggle
> q->full check on a per device basis, as well as tune the max io per
> queue. I've got two choices on how to submit it, I can either add a new
> ioctl or abuse the max_bomb_segments field in the existing ioctl.
> If we can agree on the userland tuning side, I can have some kind of
> elvtune patch tomorrow.
what about /proc ?

ciao, Marc

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 22:00:19 EST