Helge Hafting wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:44:14PM +0100, John Bradford wrote:
>
>>Well, no, opaque window moving is fine if the CPU isn't at 100%. If
>>it is, I'd rather see choppy window movements than have a server
>>application starved of CPU. That's just my preference, though.
>>
>
> That could be an interesting hack to a window manager -
> don't start the move in opaque mode when the load is high.
This isn't really an issue if the graphics engine is doing the work and
the X server doesn't busy-wait on the bitblt to finish (ie. does DMA or
calls ioctl to sleep until command-fifo-has-free-space interrupt).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 30 2003 - 22:00:17 EST