On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 23:37, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > Yes Mike's patches are definitely better. My patches are designed for
> > > > the 2.4-ck patchset which has other workarounds that augment this
> > > > patch; however these workarounds are harder to stomach for mainstream
> > > > kernels (read nasty hacks). I thought I'd offer the not so nasty
> > > > sleep_decay patch in 2.5 form for perusal and comments since people are
> > > > more willing to test 2.5 patches.
> > >
> > > Well, it's nice to know.
> > > I'm willing to test nearly any 2.5 patch. So, I'll gladly test any other
> > > ideas or patches you (or others) might have.
> >
> > ANY?
> >
> > Ok well I guess I have to give away my secret then. This is the change that
> > turns 2.5 into a desktop kernel. Note the very slight change to Ingo's
> > addon ;-)
OK, I've tested this patch but I still can easily make XMMS starve for
briefs periods of time and can also make X to start behaving jerky. If I
put the system under load (while true; do a=2; done) dragging a window
fast enough for a long time makes the X server priority decreases to a
point where the window moving is not smooth and very jerky. If I stop
dragging the window, after a while, the X server prority is restablished
and I can start all over again.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:40 EST