> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@digeo.com]
> > ACPI: make it so acpismp=force works (reported by Andrew Morton)
> But prior to 2.5.72, CPU enumeration worked fine without
> acpismp=force.
> Now it is required. How come?
(I'm taking the liberty to update the subject, which I accidentally left
blank)
Because 2.4 has that behavior. One objection that people raised to
applying the 2.4 ACPI patch was that it changed that behavior. So I made
an effort to keep it there.
I think out of sheer inertia I also re-added it to the 2.5 tree.
Probably shouldn't have.
Does anyone have a reason why acpismp=force should be in 2.5/6? If not
I'll go ahead and zap it (again), and everyone should just be aware that
this is another way that 2.4 and 2.5 differ.
Regards -- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:40 EST