Em Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 04:53:32PM -0700, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
>
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > Meanwhile, let's do this:
>
> I'd prefer the C99 thing, ie
>
> for (int i = xxx ...)
>
> syntax. I know gcc-3.x supports it, maybe 2.96 does too? If so, we could
> just add "-std=c99" or whatever, and start using that.
Humm, I'd love to do that, i.e. to make gcc 3 required, lots of good stuff
like this one, anonymous structs, etc, etc, lots of stuff could be done in
an easier way, but are we ready to abandon gcc 2.95.*? Can anyone confirm
if gcc 2.96 accepts this?
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:37 EST