On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:34:42PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> In message <20030620000137.GG29247@fs.tum.de> you write:
> > Please check whether the following patch to return IRQ_NONE in case of
> > errors is correct:
> >
> > --- linux-2.5.72-mm2/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c.old 2003-06-20 01:57:02.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.5.72-mm2/drivers/net/hamradio/yam.c 2003-06-20 01:57:41.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@
> >
> > if (--counter <= 0) {
> > printk(KERN_ERR "%s: too many irq iir=%d\n", dev->name, iir);
> > - return;
> > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > }
>
> IRQ_HANDLED, I think: it did handle them, but decided it was
> livelocked and exited.
akpm already sent a better fix to Linus.
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
Thanks
Adrian
--"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:37 EST