On Sat, 21 Jun 2003 07:37:21 +0000 (UTC)
"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <hps@intermeta.de> wrote:
> Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> writes:
>
> >There are "operating systems" whos' live cycle is set to 3 years by the
> >manufacturer. How does a long-term strategy for a company doing application
>
> Hm. Speaking of support: Most programs for Windows 95/98 still run on
> my WinXP desktop. Those binaries for RedHat Linux 5.1 don't even link
> on RHL9.
>
> Regards
> Henning
Well Henning, question is: did you jump from W95/98 to XP? You should have
followed the product flow according to the vendor:
W95->W98->NT3->NT4->W2K->XP
Have you tried your apps on NT3/NT4? If they didn't work back _then_ you
probably have exchanged them back then - which was the original intention of
the whole story.
As you may remember the licenses were just adjusted to _prevent_ people from
upgrading "multi-hop", why do you think they did that?
Regards,
Stephan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:35 EST