Re: [PATCH] reimplement pci proc name

From: Matthew Wilcox (
Date: Fri Jun 20 2003 - 09:11:32 EST

On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:02:28PM +0200, Martin Zwickel wrote:
> Hi Matthew!
> Just one question:
> If pci_name_bus copies the bus' hex to name and always returns 0,
> the "if (!pci_name_bus(name, bus)) return -EEXIST;" would always be true, right?
> Or did I miss something?

That's currently correct. My understanding is that some architectures
would like to decline to create overlapping bus numbers.

"It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:32 EST