Re: potential set_child_tid/clear_child_tid bug

From: Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com)
Date: Thu Jun 19 2003 - 14:57:36 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David Mosberger wrote:
> At the moment, if you don't set CLONE_CHILD_SETTID/CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID,
> the {set,clear}_child_tid values get inherited from the parent task.
> I may be missing something, but I suspect that's not the intended behavior.

Your change certainly creates the behavior I'd expect. I always thought
it is already the case.

- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+8hWw2ijCOnn/RHQRAsP7AJ4gDQx1iTrvBXn7z4QV2ZtyQCQ67ACgqQ6v
VtwMo6ATImKddiwrNER0+sI=
=542N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:30 EST