Re: O(1) scheduler seems to lock up on sched_FIFO and sched_RR ta sks

From: Joe Korty (
Date: Thu Jun 19 2003 - 12:28:40 EST

On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:23:30AM -0700, Robert Love wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 10:19, '' wrote:
> > I posted a fix for this a month ago that was ignored. Which is a
> > good thing, since now that I look at it again, I don't care for the
> > approach I took nor does it appear to be complete.
> Ah, sorry for missing it. Other than that tertiary statement inside an
> if ;) my patch is about the same.
> Why do you think it is incomplete? It looks correct to me.

It may be better to add it to __activate_task() rather than after the
single activate_task() use. At the time I wrote the patch I did not
think to look at the five __activate_task() calls to see if they each
needed the test. By me not looking, my patch is automatically
incorrect, even if it turns out to be correct.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 22:00:30 EST