Re: force_successful_syscall_return() buggy?

• Next message: Sumit Narayan: "Null Pointer Error"
• Previous message: CaT: "Re: 2.5.70-bk16 - nfs interferes with s4bios suspend"
• In reply to: Russell King: "force_successful_syscall_return() buggy?"
• Next in thread: Paul Mackerras: "Re: force_successful_syscall_return() buggy?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 07:36:04PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> AFAIK, sys_execve() does not ensure that the kernel stack will be empty
> before starting the user space thread, so these programs are running with
> a slightly reduced kernel stack.

Indeed. This is fixed in a rewrite I have of entry.S, but
that's not particularly stable at the moment...

r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Sumit Narayan: "Null Pointer Error"
• Previous message: CaT: "Re: 2.5.70-bk16 - nfs interferes with s4bios suspend"
• In reply to: Russell King: "force_successful_syscall_return() buggy?"
• Next in thread: Paul Mackerras: "Re: force_successful_syscall_return() buggy?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:43 EST