Re: [PATCH] udev enhancements to use kernel event queue

• Next message: Samuel Thibault: "[patch][2.5] speedstep_detect_speed might not reenable interrupts"
• Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)"
• Maybe in reply to: Steven Dake: "[PATCH] udev enhancements to use kernel event queue"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > > Turns out its 486 and higher, so you win.
> > Perhaps it's time to remove 386 support from 2.5? Users
> > of very old machines can stick with 2.0, 2.2 or 2.4.

I strongly disagree, 386 support is important for the embedded
market.

> You have to solve these problems generally anyway, and lots of
> other platforms have limited locking functions.

Including future Linux platforms.

(possibly).

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Samuel Thibault: "[patch][2.5] speedstep_detect_speed might not reenable interrupts"
• Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)"
• Maybe in reply to: Steven Dake: "[PATCH] udev enhancements to use kernel event queue"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:39 EST