Re: cryptoapi 2.5->2.4 backport

• Next message: Davide Libenzi: "RE: [PATCH] udev enhancements to use kernel event queue"
• Previous message: James Morris: "Re: Kernel comile problem"
• In reply to: Frank Cusack: "cryptoapi 2.5->2.4 backport"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Frank Cusack wrote:

> Any problem with just changing crypto/cipher.c:
>
> enum km_type crypto_km_types[] = {
> KM_USER0,
> KM_USER1,
> KM_SOFTIRQ0,
> KM_SOFTIRQ1,
> };
>
> to
>
> enum km_type crypto_km_types[] = {
> KM_USER0,
> KM_USER1,
> KM_USER0,
> KM_USER1,
> };
>
> ?

Yes, the crypto calls can run in user and softirq context.

Which backport is this?

- James

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@intercode.com.au>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Davide Libenzi: "RE: [PATCH] udev enhancements to use kernel event queue"
• Previous message: James Morris: "Re: Kernel comile problem"
• In reply to: Frank Cusack: "cryptoapi 2.5->2.4 backport"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:37 EST