Re: cachefs on linux

From: J.A. Magallon (jamagallon@able.es)
Date: Wed Jun 11 2003 - 17:26:51 EST

Next message: Patrick Mochel: "Re: sysfs: Initialization order and system devices"
Previous message: Frank Cusack: "Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)"
In reply to: Hirokazu Takahashi: "Re: cachefs on linux"
Next in thread: john@grabjohn.com: "Re: cachefs on linux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 06.11, Hirokazu Takahashi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think the main benfit of cachefs is on NFS servers. Cachefs of
> clients can help them to reduce their loads. We know many clients
> may share one huge NFS server.
> (e.g. Streaming systems which contents may be extremly huge.)
>

Tha main use of cachefs I've seen was Sun's network-booting workstations.
We had a bunch of old suns (IPX, that was a 68k), with small disks
used to cache / , /usr and so on from an nfs server. You have the
benefits of just one centralized install and the ones from local
storage for more used files....

-- 
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon@able.es>      \                 Software is like sex:
werewolf.able.es                         \           It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.21-rc7-jam1 (gcc 3.3 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3-1mdk))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Patrick Mochel: "Re: sysfs: Initialization order and system devices"
Previous message: Frank Cusack: "Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)"
In reply to: Hirokazu Takahashi: "Re: cachefs on linux"
Next in thread: john@grabjohn.com: "Re: cachefs on linux"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:30 EST