Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)

• Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] And yet more PCI fixes for 2.5.70"
• Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)"
• In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:31:32AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On 11 Jun 2003, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > fs/vfat - d_revalidate: vfat_revalidate
>
> That still shouldn't cause ESTALE, it should just force a dropping of the
> dentry, and a re-lookup (and that, in turn, should either get the right
> thing, or should return ENOENT).

.... and vfat lookup will pick what can be picked. We do not get hashed
aliases there.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] And yet more PCI fixes for 2.5.70"
• Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)"
• In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)"
• Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:28 EST