Re: 2.4.22 timeline was RE: 2.4.21-rc7 ACPI broken

From: Marcelo Tosatti (marcelo@conectiva.com.br)
Date: Mon Jun 09 2003 - 19:08:33 EST

Next message: Nick Piggin: "Re: 2.5.70-mm2 causes performance drop of random read O_DIRECT"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)"
In reply to: Margit Schubert-While: "Re: 2.4.22 timeline was RE: 2.4.21-rc7 ACPI broken"
Next in thread: Grover, Andrew: "RE: 2.4.22 timeline was RE: 2.4.21-rc7 ACPI broken"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Margit Schubert-While wrote:

> >Yes, we're fine.
> >2.4.23-pre. 2.4.22 will be a fast enough release to not piss you off on
> this, trust me.
>
> -march=pentium(x) ?
>
> Radeon 9K ?

Huh ?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nick Piggin: "Re: 2.5.70-mm2 causes performance drop of random read O_DIRECT"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "Re: [PATCH] nfs_unlink() race (was: nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch)"
In reply to: Margit Schubert-While: "Re: 2.4.22 timeline was RE: 2.4.21-rc7 ACPI broken"
Next in thread: Grover, Andrew: "RE: 2.4.22 timeline was RE: 2.4.21-rc7 ACPI broken"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:22 EST