Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Mon Jun 09 2003 - 18:00:13 EST

Next message: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: [RFC] New system device API"
Previous message: george anzinger: "[PATCH] Some clean up of the time code."
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
Reply: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

   From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
   Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:59:21 +0200 (CEST)

   You still need to synchronize with already running functions

netdev->dead = 1;
netdev->op_this = NULL;
netdev->op_that = NULL;
netdev->op_whatever = NULL;
synchronize_kernel();
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Nigel Cunningham: "Re: [RFC] New system device API"
Previous message: george anzinger: "[PATCH] Some clean up of the time code."
In reply to: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
Next in thread: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
Reply: Roman Zippel: "Re: [PATCH][ATM] use rtnl_{lock,unlock} during device operations (take 2)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:22 EST