Re: cachefs on linux

• Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "[PATCH] fix scheduler bug not passing idle"
• Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFC] device-mapper ioctl interface"
• In reply to: Leonardo H. Machado: "Re: cachefs on linux"
• Next in thread: Shawn: "Re: cachefs on linux"
• Reply: Shawn: "Re: cachefs on linux"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:26:01PM -0300, Leonardo H. Machado wrote:
>
> Why has Solaris a CacheFS file system, while linux doesn't?

Is this a "You don't know it, you don't need it" thing?

Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Martin J. Bligh: "[PATCH] fix scheduler bug not passing idle"
• Previous message: Greg KH: "Re: [dm-devel] Re: [RFC] device-mapper ioctl interface"
• In reply to: Leonardo H. Machado: "Re: cachefs on linux"
• Next in thread: Shawn: "Re: cachefs on linux"
• Reply: Shawn: "Re: cachefs on linux"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:21 EST