Re: [2.5 patch] let COMX depend on PROC_FS

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Date: Sun Jun 08 2003 - 11:58:50 EST

Next message: Dr. David Alan Gilbert: "Re: Linksys WRT54G and the GPL"
Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.5 patch] let COMX depend on PROC_FS"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.5 patch] let COMX depend on PROC_FS"
Next in thread: Pásztor Szilárd: "Re: [2.5 patch] let COMX depend on PROC_FS"
Reply: Pásztor Szilárd: "Re: [2.5 patch] let COMX depend on PROC_FS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 06:56:08PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The proc_get_inode link problem only affects the modular build of
> comx.c .

But it's still broken :) This just shows no one actually tested
it with actual hardware.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dr. David Alan Gilbert: "Re: Linksys WRT54G and the GPL"
Previous message: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.5 patch] let COMX depend on PROC_FS"
In reply to: Adrian Bunk: "Re: [2.5 patch] let COMX depend on PROC_FS"
Next in thread: Pásztor Szilárd: "Re: [2.5 patch] let COMX depend on PROC_FS"
Reply: Pásztor Szilárd: "Re: [2.5 patch] let COMX depend on PROC_FS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 22:00:19 EST