Re: irq consolidation

From: Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@linuxpower.ca)
Date: Sat Jun 07 2003 - 17:50:08 EST

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "[FUN] Re: [PATCH] Move BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON to asm headers"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Maximum swap space?"
In reply to: Russell King: "Re: irq consolidation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Russell King wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 02:48:03PM +1000, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > We are hoping to kill irq_desc[NR_IRQS] completely and instead allocate
> > them on demand with some sort of hash to map an interrupt number to an
> > irq_desc.

Anton don't you have an NR_IRQS sized interrupt stub you have to deal
with on PPC64?

I was considering perhaps only statically allocating the 0-15 on i386
just to get it booting and then dynamically allocate the rest.

Zwane

--
function.linuxpower.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Oeser: "[FUN] Re: [PATCH] Move BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON to asm headers"
Previous message: William Lee Irwin III: "Re: Maximum swap space?"
In reply to: Russell King: "Re: irq consolidation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:34 EST