Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix error reporting in case of invalid mount options

• Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [EVIL-PATCH] getting rid of lib/lib.a and breaking many archs in the processes (was Re: [PATCH] fixed: CRC32=y && 8193TOO=m unresolved symbols)"
• Previous message: René Scharfe: "Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix error reporting in case of invalid mount options"
• In reply to: René Scharfe: "Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix error reporting in case of invalid mount options"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 09:35:21 -0700 William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:
>> Let's nuke it entirely. All other fs's barf without printk()'ing at all
>> and kick -EINVAL back to the caller.

On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 07:29:27PM +0200, Ren? Scharfe wrote:
> Mmmkay, even better. Patch below.

Looks good to me. Linus, please apply.

-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [EVIL-PATCH] getting rid of lib/lib.a and breaking many archs in the processes (was Re: [PATCH] fixed: CRC32=y && 8193TOO=m unresolved symbols)"
• Previous message: René Scharfe: "Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix error reporting in case of invalid mount options"
• In reply to: René Scharfe: "Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: fix error reporting in case of invalid mount options"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:33 EST