On Fri, 6 June 2003 11:54:45 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Jörn Engel wrote:
> >
> > How do you feel about "if (z->state->blocks != NULL)"? Remove the
> > pointless !=NULL or keep it?
>
> I don't mind it, but it doesn't buy much.
>
> It's actually in some other cases where I think there is a readability
> issue, ie in more complex conditionals I personally prefer the simpler
> cersion, ie I much prefer something like
>
> if (ptr && ptr->ops && ptr->ops->shutdown)
> ptr->ops->shutdown(ptr, xxxx);
>
> over the pointless NULL-masturbation in something like
>
> if (ptr != NULL && ptr->ops != NULL && ptr->ops->shutdown != NULL)
> ptr->ops->shutdown(ptr, xxxx)
>
> which I just is much less readable than the simple version.
Good example. The ones I found in the zlib are not that bad and I am
lazy, so I'll leave them for someone else.
Jörn
-- Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that something else is more important than fear. -- Ambrose Redmoon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 07 2003 - 22:00:31 EST